Seattle Bank v. Hill et al
| Seattle Bank |
| Patsy G. Hill, Carol Lagrow aka Gwen Carol Hill, Benjamin Hill, Gwen Carol Lagrow and Gwen Carol Hill |
| 3:2023cv00098 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Kathleen Cardone |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Seattle Bank. Benjamin Hill served on 3/10/2023, answer due 3/31/2023. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Seattle Bank. Gwen Carol Lagrow served on 3/13/2023, answer due 4/3/2023. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (ep1) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Castaneda (ep1) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ep1) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Seattle Bank. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties And Corporate Disclosure Statement by Seattle Bank. (Lopez, Vivian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17160988), filed by Seattle Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
