Quesada v. El Paso Police Department et al
Robert Quesada |
El Paso Police Department, City of El Paso, Texas and Wanda Helgesen |
3:2023cv00221 |
June 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Kathleen Cardone |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 The Court ORDERS that all of Plaintiffs claims against Wanda Helgesen in her individual capacity are DISMISSED with prejudice. ORDER MOOTING #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (ep1) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Robert Quesada. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Second Amended Complaint)(ep1) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice of Claims against Wanda Helgesen in Her Personal Capacity by Wanda Helgesen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Regarding Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Auger, Valerie) |
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Wanda Helgesen, re #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Claims Alleged against Wanda Helgesen in Her Personal Capacity with Prejudice and Request for Attorney's Fees and/or Injunctive Relief filed by Defendant Wanda Helgesen (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Wanda Helgesen's Motion to Dismiss Claims against Her in Her Personal Capacity and Request for Attorney's Fees and/or Injunctive Relief)(Auger, Valerie) |
Filing 11 Certified Mailing of #9 Order on Motion for Leave to File, (ep1) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Robert Quesada, re #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Claims Alleged against Wanda Helgesen in Her Personal Capacity with Prejudice and Request for Attorney's Fees and/or Injunctive Relief filed by Defendant Wanda Helgesen (ep1) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING #7 Motion for Leave to File; GRANTING #8 Motion for Leave to File Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (ep1) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Motion to Dismiss by Robert Quesada. (Attachments: #1 Response)(ep1) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Robert Quesada. (Attachments: #1 Second Amended Complaint)(ep1) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Wanda Helgesen (Valdez, Diana) |
Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim the Claims Alleged against Wanda Helgesen in Her Personal Capacity with Prejudice and Request for Attorney's Fees and/or Injunctive Relief by Wanda Helgesen. (Auger, Valerie) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Wanda Helgesen (Auger, Valerie) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of El Paso, Texas, El Paso Police Department, Wanda Helgesen amending, filed by Robert Quesada.(ep1) |
Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by City of El Paso, Texas Waiver of the service of summons (Marquez, Matt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $402 receipt number 1342), filed by Robert Quesada. (Attachments: #1 Filing Fee Receipt, #2 Waiver of Service of Summons)(dt) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Torres (dt) |
Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone. Judge Kathleen Cardone no longer assigned to the case. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.