UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CESKA ZBROJOVKA CZ457 RIFLE CAL: 22 SN: G490555 et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CESKA ZBROJOVKA CZ457 RIFLE CAL: 22 SN: G490555 and CESKA ZBROJOVKA CZ457 RIFLE CAL: 22 SN: G128871 |
3:2023cv00282 |
August 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Briones |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion to Stay Case Signed by Judge David Briones. (mg2) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Case Motion to Stay Civil Proceedings by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order to Stay Civil Proceedings)(Acosta, Patricia) |
Filing 5 Warrant for Arrest of Property Issued for CESKA ZBROJOVKA CZ457 RIFLE CAL: 22 SN: G490555 and CESKA ZBROJOVKA CZ457 RIFLE CAL: 22 SN: G128871 (ep1) |
Filing 4 ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property. Signed by Judge David Briones. (ep1) |
Filing 3 EX PARTE VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Warrant for Arrest of Property) (mg2). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2023: #4 Appendix Sealed, #5 Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture) (ep1) Modified on 8/10/2023 (mg2). |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge CASTANEDA (mg2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.