Rook Property Management, LLC v. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Rook Property Management, LLC |
| Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and United States of America |
| 3:2023cv00362 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Kathleen Cardone |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Rook Property Management, LLC (Bagley, Taffy) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ep1) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Rook Property Management, LLC. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION FKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Bagley, Taffy) |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (ep1)
|
| Filing 2 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Petition by Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. (Hines, Natashia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL, filed by Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement to JS 44)(ep1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
