Vargas v. United States Border Patrol-Customs and Border Protection et al
| Jose Manuel Vargas |
| United States Border Patrol-Customs and Border Protection, United States Border Patrol Supervisor and United States Border Patrol |
| 3:2023cv00410 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Briones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Jose Manuel Vargas. (mg2) |
| Filing 5 Signed Certified Mail Receipt of #3 Order (mg2) |
| Filing 4 Certified Mailing of #3 Order (mg2) |
Filing 3
ORDER. The Court accordingly ORDERS Vargas to either pay the $405.00 filing fee or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge David Briones. (mg2)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Amend Complaint and Request Jury by Jose Manuel Vargas. (mg2) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose Manuel Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Affidavit, #3 Supplement, #4 Supplement, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Motion to Compel)(mg2) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2023: #7 Supplement) (mg2). |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge BERTON (mg2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
