Dolic v. Layer1 Technologies, Inc
| Javoc Dolic |
| Layer1 Technology, Inc |
| 4:2020cv00078 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| David B Fannin |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #19 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice. The Court VACATES its Final Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. 17). This case is dismissed without prejudice. Entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Vacate Order of Dismissal with Prejudice by Javoc Dolic. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harrell, Robert) |
|
Filing 18
Final ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice re #17 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Javoc Dolic. It is ORDERED that the claims in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED attorney fees, expenses and court costs shall be borne by the party incurring same. It is further ORDERED that all other relief not expressly granted herein is DENIED. It is finally ORDERED that all pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. The Court VACATES the Final Pretrial Hearing and Trial Setting, if any. Signed by Judge David Counts. (ab1) "VACATED PER ORDER see text order dated 12/2/20." Modified on 12/2/2020 (ab1).
|
| CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge David B. Fannin. (ab1) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Javoc Dolic (Harrell, Robert) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. It is further ORDERED if Mr. Pomerantz has not already done so, he shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). Entered by Judge David B. Fannin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bz)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. It is further ORDERED if Ms. Bafus has not already done so, she shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). Entered by Judge David B. Fannin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bz)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #15 Motion to Withdraw entered by Judge David Counts. The Court ORDERS that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7 ) is hereby WITHDRAWN. The Court further VACATES the hearing set in relation to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction for Friday, November 13, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. It is so ORDERED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(mas)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Layer1 Technology, Inc, re #15 MOTION to Withdraw Motion for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Javoc Dolic (Hopkins, Jason) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw Motion for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Javoc Dolic.. Motions referred to Judge David B. Fannin. (Berry, William) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason M. Hopkins on Behalf of Marie C. Bafus ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14171987) by on behalf of Layer1 Technology, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge David B. Fannin. (Hopkins, Jason) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason M. Hopkins on Behalf of Jay L. Pomerantz ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14171959) by on behalf of Layer1 Technology, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge David B. Fannin. (Hopkins, Jason) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO JAVOK DOLIC'S ex parte MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Layer1 Technology, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Liegl with Exhibits)(Hopkins, Jason) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Robert S. Harrell on behalf of Alex C. Lakatos ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14145378) by on behalf of Javoc Dolic. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge David B. Fannin. (Harrell, Robert) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Alex C. Lakatos entered by Judge David Counts. It is therefore ORDERED that Mr. Lakatos may appear on behalf of Plaintiff Jakov Dolic in this case. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Lakatos shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00 to the U.S. District Clerk in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). It is finally ORDERED that pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our Court within 10 days of the entry of this Order. It is so ORDERED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(mas)
|
| Plaintiff's Motion Hearing for Preliminary Injunction on Friday, 11/13/2020 09:30 AM in Courthouse 3, on the third floor of the United States Courthouse, 200 E. Wall, Midland Texas before Judge David Counts. (ab1) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER CORRECTING ORDER REVOKING TEXT ORDER re #8 Order. Signed by Judge David B. Fannin. (yl)
|
|
Text Order MOOTING 3 Ex Parte Motion entered by Judge David Counts. Plaintiff refiled the Ex Parte Motion with a Corrected Proposed Order. (Doc. 7 ). Accordingly, the instant Ex Parte Motion is MOOT. It is so ORDERED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(mas)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Revoking Text Order re 7 EX PARTE MOTION filed by Javoc Dolic. Signed by Judge David B. Fannin. (ab1)
|
| Filing 6 re 3 EX PARTE MOTION (ab1) Modified on 10/30/2020 (ab1). |
| Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Javoc Dolic. (ab1) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Layer1 Technology, Inc. (ab1) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Javoc Dolic. Summons (Harrell, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-14130424), filed by Javoc Dolic. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Plaintiff's bank statement, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Purchase agreement for substation, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Purchase agreement for expansion, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Harrell, Robert) |
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ab1) |
|
Text Order GRANTING 7 Ex Parte Motion. A written order detailing the Judge's reasoning will be forthcoming. Entered by Judge David B. Fannin. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bz)
|
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge David B. Fannin.. Referral Judge: David B. Fannin. (ab1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
