Farrar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
| Patrick Farrar |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 5:2004cv00775 |
| August 27, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| W Royal Furgeson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2005. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Re-Sent copy of Judgment REMANDING case to Bexar County Court no. 7 (tm) |
| Certified copy of order and docket sheet sent to County Court at Law #7, Bexar County, Texas. (rg1) |
| Filing 13 Minutes of proceedings for Motion hearing conducted on 11/15/04 by Judge Furgeson. Court Reporter: Roden (tm) |
| Filing 12 Final Judgment of Remand. Ordered that this action be remanded to the County Court at Law #7, Bexar County, Texas. All pending motions be Denied as Moot, each party bear its own costs signed by Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (Pages: 1) (lp) |
Filing 11
Order granting motion to remand [2-1] signed by Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (lp)
|
| Case closed (lp) |
| Motion hearing held for the following motions: motion to remand [2-1]. Statements heard from Court and parties. Court to remand back to state court. Court to enter order to this effect. Mr. Gibbons withdraws motion for sanctions. Courts in recess. (tm) |
| Filing 10 Minutes of proceedings for Motion hearing conducted on November 15, 2004 by Judge Furgeson. Court Reporter: Denver Roden (lp) |
|
Filing 9
Order Motion hearing motion to remand [2-1] for 5:00 11/15/04 signed by Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (lp)
|
| Filing 8 Recommendations for scheduling order by Patrick Farrar, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (lp) |
| Filing 7 Non-consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (rg1) |
| Filing 6 Response by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc motion to remand [2-1] (lp) |
| Filing 5 Non-consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate by Patrick Farrar (rg1) |
| Filing 4 Non-consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate by Patrick Farrar (tm) |
|
Filing 3
Order that the plaintiff shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within sixty (60) days after the appearance of any defendant. Signed by Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (lp)
|
| Filing 2 Motion by Patrick Farrar to remand (lp) |
| Filing 1 Notice for Removal by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc Filing Fee: $ 150.00 Receipt # 191085 (ep) Modified on 08/30/2004 |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Nowak (ep) |
| Case assigned to Hon. W. R. Furgeson Jr. (ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Farrar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Farrar | |
| Represented By: | Larry Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Temple |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
