Lorenz v. Texas Workforce, et al
| Daniel Abraham Lorenz |
| Texas Workforce Commission and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. |
| 5:2004cv00806 |
| September 7, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Sent certified copy of court's order of remand to the Bandera COunty Courthouse. (tm) |
Filing 51
ORDER remanding case to the 216th Judicial District of Bandera County, TX Cause no. 9197-04. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (tm)
|
| Filing 50 Appeal Record Returned from USCA: #46 Notice of Appeal (bn, ) |
| Filing 49 Certified copy of USCA JUDGMENT/MANDATE vacated and remanding #46 (Vacate the orders of the district court and Remand this case to the district court with instructions that it be remanded to the state court from which it was removed.) Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel Abraham Lorenz, (bn, ) |
| Certified and transmitted record on appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: appeal [46-1] Sent Directly to 5th circuit per their request. (lp) |
|
Filing 48
Order denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [47-1] signed by Honorable Orlando L. Garcia (lp)
|
| Return of appeal information sheet received. appeal [46-1] USCA NUMBER: 05-50938 (lp) |
| Notice of appeal and certified copy of docket to USCA: appeal [46-1] (lp) |
| Filing 47 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (lp) |
| Filing 46 Notice of appeal by Daniel Abraham Lorenz (lp) |
| Sent certified copy of order remanding case to Bandera County Court CLerk (tm) |
|
Filing 45
Order ACCEPTING recommendation of Magistrate Judge: granting motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies [5-1], denying motion to sever plaintiff's claims for judicial review Texas Labor Code section 212.201 [11-1], granting motion remand state claim to 216th District Court, Bandera County Texas [13-1] signed by Honorable Orlando L. Garcia (tm)
|
| Case closed (tm) |
| Filing 44 Objections to report and recommendations [40-1] by Daniel Abraham Lorenz (sj) |
| Filing 43 Response by Daniel Abraham Lorenz in opposition to defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's motion for an order of a non-listed alternative dispute resolution mediation service... [42-1] (sj) |
| Filing 42 Motion by Texas Workforce, Wal-Mart Associates to strike plaintiff's motion for an order of a non-listed alternative dispute resolution mediation service... (rg1) |
| Filing 41 All matters referred to the Magistrate Judge having been considered and acted upon, it is ORDERED this matter is RETURNED to the District Court fo all purposes signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (sj) |
| Filing 40 Report and recommendation of Judge Nancy Stein Nowak: motion for an order of a non listed alternative dispute resolution mediation service for the commencement of mediation [38-1] be denied as moot; motion to remand state claim to 216th District Court, Bandera County Texas [13-1] be granted; motion to sever plaintiff's claims for judicial review under Texas Labor Code section 212.201 [11-1] be denied as moot; motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies [5-1] be granted. (sj) |
|
Filing 39
Order DENYING motion to strike dft's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies [15-1] signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (sj)
|
| CASE NO LONGER REFERRED TO Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (sj) |
| Filing 38 Pro Se Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz for an order of a non0listed alternative dispute resolution mediation service for the commencement of mediation (rg1) |
|
Filing 37
Order granting motion to withdraw plaintiff's motion to compel dft's objections to plaintiff's interrogatories and request for production [33-1] signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (rg1)
|
| Filing 36 Agreed Protective Order signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (rg1) |
|
Filing 35
Scheduling order setting Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 5/27/05 Joining of parties, amending of pleadings on 6/13/05 Discovery cutoff 8/25/05 Deadline for filing of all motions 9/9/05 ; Bench trial set for 9:30 1/3/06 signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (rg1)
|
| Filing 34 Response by Texas Workforce motion to compel defendant Texas Workforce Commission's objections to plaintiff's requests for production [31-1], motion to compel defendant Texas Workforce Commission's responses to plaintiff's interrogatories [30-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 33 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to withdraw plaintiff's motion to compel dft's objections to plaintiff's interrogatories and request for production (rg1) |
|
Filing 32
Order striking motion to compel defendant Wal-Mart's responses to plaintiff's request for production [28-1], striking motion to compel defendant Wal-Mart's responses to plaintiff's interrogatories [29-1], striking motion to compel defendant Texas Workforce Commission's responses to plaintiff's interrogatories [30-1], striking motion to compel defendant Texas Workforce Commission's objections to plaintiff's requests for production [31-1] signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (tm)
|
| Filing 31 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to compel defendant Texas Workforce Commission's objections to plaintiff's requests for production (tm) |
| Filing 30 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to compel defendant Texas Workforce Commission's responses to plaintiff's interrogatories (tm) |
| Filing 29 Plaintiff's motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to compel defendant Wal-Mart's responses to plaintiff's interrogatories (tm) |
| Filing 28 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to compel defendant Wal-Mart's responses to plaintiff's request for production (tm) |
| Proposed Agreed Protective Order forwarded to Judge Nowak for approval. (rg1) |
|
Filing 27
Order OVERRULING plaintiff's objection to the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for default judgment [26-1] signed by Honorable Orlando L. Garcia (tm)
|
| Filing 26 Objections by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to order denying default judgment [25-1] (tm) |
|
Filing 25
Order denying as moot motion for default judgment against Wal-Mart Associates [3-1] signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (rg1)
|
|
Filing 24
Order denying motion for assistance from the Western District for the purposes fo depositions and/or affidavits [22-1] signed by Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (rg1)
|
| Case referred to Honorable Nancy S. Nowak (ga) |
|
Filing 23
Order of Recusal - matter is to be reassigned to another US Magistrate judge. signed by Honorable John W. Primomo (rg1)
|
| Filing 22 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz for assistance from the Western District for the purposes fo depositions and/or affidavits (rg1) |
| Filing 21 Response by Wal-Mart Associates to Plaintiff's Second Response [19-1] to defendant's reply to Notice of Removal (sj) |
| Filing 20 Response by Wal-Mart Associates to plaintiff's motion to strike dft's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies [15-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 19 Second Response by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to dft Walmart's reply [10-1] to notice of removal (rg1) |
| Filing 18 Reply by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to response to motion for default judgment against Wal-Mart Associates [3-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 17 Response by Wal-Mart Associates to co-defendant's motion to remand state claim to 216th District Court, Bandera County Texas [13-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 16 Response by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to dft's answer [4-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 15 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to strike dft's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (rg1) |
| Filing 14 Memorandum by Daniel Abraham Lorenz in support of motion to remand state claim to 216th District Court, Bandera County Texas [13-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 13 Motion by Texas Workforce to remand state claim to 216th District Court, Bandera County Texas (rg1) |
| Filing 12 Response by Wal-Mart Associates motion for default judgment against Wal-Mart Associates [3-1] (rg1) |
| Filing 11 Motion by Wal-Mart Associates to sever plaintiff's calims fro judicial review under Texas Labor Code section 212.201 (rg1) |
| Filing 10 Reply by Wal-Mart Associates to response to Notice of Removal (rg1) |
| Filing 9 Response by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to Texas Workforce's original answer (lp) |
| Filing 8 Response by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to Texas Workforce request for special exceptions (lp) |
| Filing 7 Notice of filing memorandum in opposition to defendant Texas Workforce motion to sever by Daniel Abraham Lorenz (lp) |
|
Filing 6
Order referring case to magistrate judge for disposition of all pretrial matters signed by Honorable Orlando L. Garcia (rg1)
|
| Filing 5 Motion by Wal-Mart Associates to dismiss plaintiff's claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (rg1) |
| Filing 4 Answer by Wal-Mart Associates (rg1) |
| Case referred to Honorable John W. Primomo (rg1) |
| Filing 3 Motion by Daniel Abraham Lorenz for default judgment against Wal-Mart Associates (tm) |
| Filing 2 Response by Daniel Abraham Lorenz to notice of removal petition [1-1] (tm) |
| Filing 1 Notice for Removal by Wal-Mart Associates Filing Fee: $ 150.00 Receipt # 191235 (ep) Modified on 09/08/2004 |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Primomo (ep) |
| Case assigned to Honorable Orlando L. Garcia (ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
