Epley v. Schwinge
Plaintiff: Laura Epley
Defendant: Laura Schwinge
Case Number: 5:2008cv01008
Filed: December 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Real Property: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Fred Biery
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending to DENY 4 MOTION for Default Judgment against Laura Schwinge filed by Laura Epley, DENY 10 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 9(b) and Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Laura Epley. Signed by Judge Nancy Stein Nowak. (mailed on 3/23/09, by certified mail or forwarded electronically) (rf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Epley v. Schwinge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Epley
Represented By: Marquis E. Whittington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura Schwinge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?