Commercial Metals Company et al v. S&C Electric Company et al
Commercial Metals Company and Structural Metals, Inc. |
S&C Electric Company and Fred Oberlender & Associates, Inc. |
5:2009cv00984 |
December 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
San Antonio Office |
Dallas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 175 ORDER re 152 Bill of Costs filed by Structural Metals, Inc. Total award of costs of $38,256.82.Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) |
Filing 149 ORDER GRANTING 141 Motion for entry of final judgment; DENYING 142 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. The Court will issue judgment for $306,500, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 5%, beginning November 12, 2009. Plaintiff is awarded its costs of court and shall file a bill of costs and any motion for attorneys fees pursuant to the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) |
Filing 107 ORDER GRANTING 95 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) |
Filing 102 ORDER DENYING 92 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) |
Filing 69 ORDER GRANTING 49 Motion to amend answer ; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 51 Motion to limit expert testimony. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.