Mendez v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Plaintiff: Joyce D. Mendez
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Case Number: 5:2010cv00750
Filed: September 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 such that the 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas is GRANTED and the 22 Motion to Strike filed by Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (tm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce D. Mendez
Represented By: Jesse R. Castillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?