Holliday et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Araceli M Holliday and Andres M Holliday |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, DOES 1-50 Inclusive, America's Servicing Company and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 5:2011cv01133 |
| December 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER re 24 OBJECTION (which the Court construes as a motion to alter or amend judgment) MOTION to Set Aside filed by Andres M Holliday, Araceli M Holliday is DENIED. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DISMISSING AS MOOT 21 Motion to Stay Case; DISMISSING AS MOOT 21 Motion to Amend/Correct; GRANTING 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant MERS has not been served or otherwise appeared in this case and well over 120 days have passed since the complaint was filed. Accordingly, Defendant MERS is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants are awarded their costs of court and must file a Bill of Costs in the form required by the Clerk of Court within fourteen days of the judgment. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
