Rodriguez et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Marina Rodriguez and Brian Rodriguez
Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00345
Filed: April 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER DENYING 68 Motion for New Trial Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER GRANTING 58 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 59 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. There being no remaining issues, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and issue a judgment that Plaintiffs take nothing on their claims which are hereby DISMISSED ON THE MERITS. Defendant is awarded costs of court and shall file a Bill of Costs in accordance with the local rules. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (kh)
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 46 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to Plaintiffs' causes of action for violation of the U.C.C., violation of Chapte r 12 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and breach of contract. Accordingly, those three causes of action are dismissed. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part with respect to Plaintiffs' ; cause of action to quiet title. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied with respect to Plaintiffs' claim to quiet title insofar as the Court cannot find from the current record that the foreclosure sale was valid because the re is no evidence that Plaintiffs were sent notices of default by certified mail in compliance with section 51.002(d) of the Texas Property Code. Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' cause of action to quiet title is gra nted in all other respects. The sole issue remaining in this case is whether Defendant sent Plaintiffs notices of default by certified mail in compliance with section 51.002(d) of the Texas Property Code. Either party may file a motion for summary judgment on the issue by no later than July 3, 2013. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (kh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Matthew H. Davis
Represented By: Benjamin David Lee Foster
Represented By: Robert T. Mowrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marina Rodriguez
Represented By: Kenneth Ernest Grubbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Rodriguez
Represented By: Kenneth Ernest Grubbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?