Timoschuk v. Daimler Trucks North America et al
Plaintiff: Endang Widuri Timoschuk
Defendant: Voges Drilling, Co., Andrew Morgan Weathers, Daimler Trucks North America, LLC and Schneider National Leasing, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00816
Filed: September 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER DENYING 115 Motion to Compel Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
June 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 82 Motion for Summary Judgment; Daimler's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in PART with Respect to Plaintiff's claims for marketing defect, and breach of warranty. It is DENIED in PART with respect to the claims of defective design, negligence, and for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER DENYING 80 Motion Limit Expert TestimonyLimit Expert Testimony; GRANTING 84 Motion Limit Expert TestimonyLimit Expert Testimony; DENYING 85 Motion to exclude Expert Testimony Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
June 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER DENYING 83 Motion Opposed Motion for Application of Presumption found in 82.008 Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
February 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING 58 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Expert Witness Disclosure. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timoschuk v. Daimler Trucks North America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Voges Drilling, Co.
Represented By: Larry J. Goldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Morgan Weathers
Represented By: Larry J. Goldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daimler Trucks North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schneider National Leasing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Endang Widuri Timoschuk
Represented By: Thomas Dale Jones
Represented By: Michael L. Ihrig
Represented By: Terrence E. McCartney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?