Timoschuk v. Daimler Trucks North America et al
Endang Widuri Timoschuk |
Voges Drilling, Co., Andrew Morgan Weathers, Daimler Trucks North America, LLC and Schneider National Leasing, Inc. |
5:2012cv00816 |
September 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
San Antonio Office |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER DENYING 115 Motion to Compel Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) |
Filing 106 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 82 Motion for Summary Judgment; Daimler's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in PART with Respect to Plaintiff's claims for marketing defect, and breach of warranty. It is DENIED in PART with respect to the claims of defective design, negligence, and for punitive damages. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) |
Filing 105 ORDER DENYING 80 Motion Limit Expert TestimonyLimit Expert Testimony; GRANTING 84 Motion Limit Expert TestimonyLimit Expert Testimony; DENYING 85 Motion to exclude Expert Testimony Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) |
Filing 104 ORDER DENYING 83 Motion Opposed Motion for Application of Presumption found in 82.008 Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) |
Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING 58 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Expert Witness Disclosure. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.