Romano v. Kardashian et al
Gino Romano |
Kim Kardashian, Tony Parker, Eva Longoria and Kourtney Kardashian |
5:2012mc00605 |
June 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
San Antonio Office |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (tr1) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS #5 . Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (tr1) |
Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt for service of report and recommendation #5 to Gino Romano on 7/9/12. (tr1) (tr1, ). |
Filing 6 ORDER returning case to the District Court. Signed by Judge Pamela A. Mathy. (tr1) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gino Romano should be DENIED and the #2 Motion for TRO filed by Gino Romano should be DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Pamela A. Mathy. (Served by certified mail or electronically) (tr1) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Gino Romano. Show Cause Response due by 7/5/2012. Signed by Judge Pamela A. Mathy. (dtg) |
MOTION REFERRED: referred #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referral Judge: Pamela A. Mathy. (rg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Gino Romano. (rg) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gino Romano. (rg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mathy. (rg) |
Case Assigned to the Honorable Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.