Wright v. McHugh
Laura L. Wright |
John McHugh |
5:2013cv00449 |
May 28, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
San Antonio Office |
David Ezra |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 ORDER DENYING 40 Motion to Amend Complaint; GRANTING 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rf) |
Filing 24 ORDER DENYING 16 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rf) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wright v. McHugh | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Laura L. Wright | |
Represented By: | Anita Jane Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John McHugh | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.