Wright v. McHugh
Plaintiff: Laura L. Wright
Defendant: John McHugh
Case Number: 5:2013cv00449
Filed: May 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: David Ezra
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER DENYING 40 Motion to Amend Complaint; GRANTING 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rf)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DENYING 16 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rf)
January 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura L. Wright
Represented By: Anita Jane Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John McHugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?