Barroso, et al. v. State of Texas, et al.
| Marcus E. Barroso, Twelve Jay Does, Twelve Jeff Does, Twelve Joe Does and Twelve John Does |
| All Counties in the State of Texas, Sheriff of Bexar County, Texas, Sheriffs (or similar officials) of All Counties in the State of Texas, State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Wardens (or similar officials) of All State Prisons and State Jails in the State of Texas |
| 5:2014cv00421 |
| May 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| Harry Lee Hudspeth |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
179
ORDER DENYING 175 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rf)
|
|
Filing
172
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting Magistrate Judge Primomo's Memorandum and Recommendation signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial and to Take Testimony (docket no. 145) is DENIED. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. (mr)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER, DENYING 129 MOTION to Disqualify Judge ; MOTION for Reconsideration of Order Granting Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment; MOTION (by Plaintiff Barroso only) for Reconsideration of Order Denying Plaintiff Barroso's Motion for Default Judgment ag.. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (sf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
