Lawson v. DDR DB STONE OAK LP
| James Lawson |
| DDR DB STONE OAK LP, Reel Dinner Partners VII, LLC and Alamo Drafthouse Cinemas, LLC |
| 5:2015cv00560 |
| July 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12188 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej)
|
| Filing 21 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER, that all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against DDR DB Stone Oak, LP are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Lawson (Zwilling, Edward) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER the parties shall file a motion to dismiss or stipulation of dismissal on or before May 19, 2016, re #17 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by James Lawson. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (rf)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #16 Order to Show Cause by James Lawson. (Zwilling, Edward) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to James Lawson. Show Cause Response due by 4/29/2016. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej)
|
|
Filing 15
Order for Proposed Scheduling Order. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court by 4/8/2016. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #12 Order to Show Cause by James Lawson. (Zwilling, Edward) |
| Filing 13 Original ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint . Attorney Charles W. Shipman added to party Reel Dinner Partners VII, LLC(pty:dft) by Reel Dinner Partners VII, LLC.(Shipman, Charles) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to James Lawson. Show Cause Response due by 1/29/2016. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej)
|
| Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Reel Dinner Partners VII, LLC amending #5 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint filed by James Lawson.(aej) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by James Lawson, DDR DB STONE OAK LP terminated. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (aej)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Lawson. Alamo Drafthouse Cinemas, LLC served on 8/12/2015, answer due 9/2/2015. (Zwilling, Edward) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Lawson (Zwilling, Edward) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Alamo Drafthouse Cinemas, LLC. (sf) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by James Lawson. (Zwilling, Edward) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DDR DB STONE OAK LP, Alamo Drafthouse Cinemas, LLC, filed by James Lawson.(sf) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Lawson. DDR DB STONE OAK LP served on 7/13/2015, answer due 8/3/2015. (Zwilling, Edward) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DDR DB STONE OAK LP. (aej) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (aej) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (aej) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by James Lawson. (Zwilling, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-7594851), filed by James Lawson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Zwilling, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
