DoubleTake Archery, LLC v. Out Rage, LLC
Plaintiff: DoubleTake Archery, LLC
Defendant: Out Rage, LLC
Case Number: 5:2015cv00602
Filed: July 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: David A. Ezra
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. This Matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (sf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DoubleTake Archery, LLC v. Out Rage, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DoubleTake Archery, LLC
Represented By: William Loughborough McCamish
Represented By: Todd A. Prins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Out Rage, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?