Sifuentes v. Guy
| Jose Sifuentes and Jose Alfredo Sifuentes-Sandoval |
| Joseph Guy |
| 5:2018cv00556 |
| June 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT, Pursuant to this Court's Dismissal Order, Plaintiff Jose Sifuentes' 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint construed as a Bivens Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 2,. U.S.C. 1406(a) for lack of venue. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, Plaintiff's current filing construed as a Bivens Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) for lack of venue. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
|
| Filing 5 Case electronically transferred in from Northern District of Texas; Case Number 4:18-cv-00461. |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SEVERING AND TRANSFERRING CLAIMS: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants David Briones and Robert Perez are hereby severed from the instant action and transferred to the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division; Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Joseph Guy are hereby severed from the instant action and transferred to the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division; and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Lisa Cooper are hereby severed from the instant action and transferred to the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. There being no claims or Defendants remaining in this case, the Clerk of Court shall administratively close the case. (New case numbers: Sifuentes v. Briones et al, 4:18-cv-460-O; Sifuentes v Perez, 4:18-cv-461-O; Sifuentes v Cooper 4:18- cv-462-O) (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/6/2018) (plp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/7/2018.]
|
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (plp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/7/2018.] |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (plp) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/7/2018.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Guy filed by Jose Sifuentes. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (plp) Modified on 6/6/2018 (plp). [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/7/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
