Star Operations, Inc. v. The Lane Construction Corporation
| Star Operations, Inc. |
| The Lane Construction Corporation |
| 5:2018cv00728 |
| July 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| San Antonio Office |
| David A Ezra |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CORRECTED MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Lawsuit Pending Arbitration by The Lane Construction Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subcontract, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Lawsuit Pending Arbitration)(Carroll, Brian) |
| Filing 8 ***NOTIFIED COUNSEL, FILE A PROPOSED ORDER AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THE MOTION **DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #7 Opposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Lawsuit Pending Arbitration (wg) |
| Filing 7 ***MOTION MISSING PROPOSED ORDER, PLEASE CURE DEFICIENCY AND FILE ONLY A PROPOSED ORDER ****Opposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Lawsuit Pending Arbitration by The Lane Construction Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subcontract)(Carroll, Brian) Modified on 8/31/2018 (wg). |
| Filing 6 The Lane Construction Corporation's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Star Operations, Inc. Attorney Brian K. Carroll added to party The Lane Construction Corporation(pty:dft) by The Lane Construction Corporation.(Carroll, Brian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Star Operations, Inc.. The Lane Construction Corporation served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Wymer, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Lane Construction Corporation. (wg) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Star Operations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Original Complaint)(Wymer, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 ATTACHMENT Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint by Star Operations, Inc.. (Wymer, Matthew) |
| Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (wg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11008897). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Star Operations, Inc..(Wymer, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Star Operations, Inc. v. The Lane Construction Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Star Operations, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew F. Wymer |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Gayle Kemble |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Lane Construction Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Brian K. Carroll |
| Represented By: | Allen Vance Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
