The View at Encino Commons v. Ankhamen
Plaintiff: The View at Encino Commons
Defendant: Caleb Ankhamen
Case Number: 5:2018cv00750
Filed: July 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth S Chestney
Referring Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #18 Motion to Compel entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lel)
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #17 Motion to Compel entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lel)
September 6, 2018 Filing 20 NOTICE by Caleb Ankhamen (aej)
September 6, 2018 Filing 19 Verification of Proof of Claim by Caleb Ankhamen (aej)
September 6, 2018 Filing 18 PRO SE MOTION to Compel by Caleb Ankhamen. (aej)
September 6, 2018 Filing 17 PRO SE MOTION to Compel by Caleb Ankhamen. (aej)
September 6, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE by Caleb Ankhamen (aej)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #13 Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. This case has been remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and jurisdiction has been returned to the state court. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lel)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #15 Motion for Reconsideration entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The Court has already remanded this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and jurisdiction has been returned to the state court. Defendant did not timely file objections. Objections were due within 14 days of service, and pursuant to Rule 5 service is complete upon mailing, not when mail is received, though Rule 6 adds an extra 3 days when service is made by mail. Therefore, objections were due August 20, and the Court issued its order on August 22. Moreover, the Court previously noted that, even considering the late-filed objections, remand would still have been required for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court no longer has jurisdiction in this case and further motions will be summarily denied. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lel)
September 4, 2018 Filing 15 PRO SE MOTION for Reconsideration by Caleb Ankhamen. (aej)
September 4, 2018 Filing 14 RESPONSE - Answer to Complaint and Counterclaim by Caleb Ankhamen. (aej)
September 4, 2018 Filing 13 PRO SE MOTION to Dismiss by Caleb Ankhamen. (aej)
August 30, 2018 Filing 12 Remand Letter to County Court at Law #3. (aej)
August 24, 2018 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by Caleb Ankhamen.(aej)
August 24, 2018 Filing 10 PRO SE Miscellaneous Objection to #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Caleb Ankhamen. (aej)
August 24, 2018 Filing 9 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to File Objection by Caleb Ankhamen. (Attachments: #1 Objection)(aej)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING #9 Motion for Leave to File entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The Court has already remanded this case and jurisdiction has been returned to the state court. However, even considering the objections, remand would still be required for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lel)
August 23, 2018 Filing 8 Remand Letter to Bexar County District Clerk. (aej)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTING #5 Motion to Remand to State Court Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rf)
August 6, 2018 Filing 6 Proposed Pretrial Order Motion to Remand to Bexar County Court at Law by The View at Encino Commons. (Fritsche, R.)
August 6, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by The View at Encino Commons. (Fritsche, R.)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER, CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (aej)
August 1, 2018 Filing 3 Certified Mail Receipt of #2 Report and Recommendations (aej)
August 1, 2018 Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Caleb Ankhamen. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (aej)
July 20, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Caleb Ankhamen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement to JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet) Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg)
July 20, 2018 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg)
July 20, 2018 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (dtg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The View at Encino Commons v. Ankhamen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The View at Encino Commons
Represented By: R. David Fritsche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caleb Ankhamen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?