Cleland Sales Corporation et al v. Schroeder Industries, Inc.
Cleland Sales Corporation and James Cleland |
Schroeder Industries, Inc. |
5:2018cv00856 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
San Antonio Office |
David A Ezra |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (wg) |
Filing 18 ORDER DENYING re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by Cleland Sales Corporation, James Cleland, Motions terminated: The Court further DISMISSES AS MOOT Plaintiffs Complaint for DeclaratoryJudgment (Dkt. # 1). The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (wg) |
Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to #8 Sealed Document by James Cleland, Cleland Sales Corporation. (Jasper, Jennifer) |
Filing 17 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David A. Ezra: Taken under Advisement, separate Order shall be issued.Motion Hearing held on 9/10/2018 re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by Cleland Sales Corporation, James Cleland (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter Angela Hailey.)(wg) |
Filing 15 APPENDIX to #10 Response to Motion, by Schroeder Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Nash, William) |
Filing 14 ***NOTIFIED COUNSEL, DOCUMENT MISSING COVER PAGE, NO ATTY. SIGNATURE OR CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED. ***DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #11 Response to Motion, #13 Appendix (wg) |
Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT, NO COVER PAGE, ATTY. SIGNATURE OR CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED ***APPENDIX to #10 Response to Motion, by Schroeder Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Nash, William) Modified on 9/10/2018 (wg). |
Filing 12 ***NOTIFIED COUNSEL, DOCUMENT SCANNED IMRPOPERLY, RE-FILE DOC. ***DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #11 Response to Motion, (wg) |
Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT, DOCUMENT IMPROPERLY SCANNED, PLEASE REFILE DOC. ***RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Schroeder Industries, Inc., re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Cleland Sales Corporation, Plaintiff James Cleland (Corrected Declaration to Schroeders Supplemental Response) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Nash, William) Modified on 9/10/2018 (wg). |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Schroeder Industries, Inc., re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Cleland Sales Corporation, Plaintiff James Cleland (Supplemental Response) (Attachments: #1 Supplement Supplemental Declaration, #2 Supplement Exhibits to Supplemental Declaration)(Nash, William) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of John van Loben Sels. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (at) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jennifer D. Jasper for John van Loben Sels ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-11184972) by on behalf of James Cleland, Cleland Sales Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Jasper, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 Sealed Document filed by Plaintiff's (wg) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by Cleland Sales Corporation, James Cleland, ( Motion Hearing set for 9/10/2018 10:30 AM before Judge David A. Ezra,). Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (wg) |
Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Plaintiffs Opposed Emergency Motion to Stay Arbitration, #2 Proposed Order) (Jasper, Jennifer) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ps) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Schroeder Industries, Inc., re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Cleland Sales Corporation, Plaintiff James Cleland (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Nash, William) |
Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENT to #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration by James Cleland, Cleland Sales Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Jasper, Jennifer) |
Notice to Attorney's : Exhibit #8 was Sealed Per Plaintiff's Counsel re #3 Opposed MOTION to Stay Arbitration. (wg) |
Filing 3 Opposed EMERGENCY MOTION to Stay Arbitration by James Cleland, Cleland Sales Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Robert D. Fish, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Sealed Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Proposed Order)(Jasper, Jennifer) Modified text on 8/22/2018 (wg). |
Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Cleland Sales Corporation. (Jasper, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11135919). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Cleland Sales Corporation, James Cleland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jasper, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.