Nicholas Canup v. CHW Group, Inc.
| Nicholas Canup |
| CHW Group, Inc. |
| 5:2018cv00863 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING SETTLEMENT, STAYING ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES, DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS, CANCELING ALL SETTINGS AND REQUESTING FILING OF AN AGREED ORDER - The parties shall submit their settlement papers or stipulation of dismissal and any appropriate supporting documents on or before November 5, 2018. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Nicholas Canup (Agruss, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; CHW Group, Inc. answer due 10/11/2018. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg)
|
| Filing 8 ATTACHMENT to #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Nicholas Canup. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: to attorney Michael Agruss -Proposed order required with motion. DO NOT re-file entire document. Please file ONLY the proposed order using the "Attachment" event located under "Other Documents" from menu and link the proposed order to thisdocument. See page 11, item 9d of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, Western of District of Texas. re #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (rg) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT DEFICIENT - See Deficiency Notice #7. Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Nicholas Canup. (Agruss, Michael) Modified on 9/25/2018 (rg). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicholas Canup. CHW Group, Inc. served on 8/30/2018, answer due 9/20/2018. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CHW Group, Inc. (rg) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties by Nicholas Canup. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Nicholas Canup. (Agruss, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-11148043). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Nicholas Canup. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Agruss, Michael) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (rg) |
| Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) (rg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nicholas Canup v. CHW Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHW Group, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Canup | |
| Represented By: | Michael S. Agruss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
