Trentcosta v. Davis
Terry Trentcosta and Terry Trentacosta |
Lorie Davis |
5:2018cv00892 |
August 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Elizabeth S Chestney |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Deadlines: Lorie Davis answer due 11/8/2018. (mgr) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Order by Lorie Davis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (Hanna, Cara) |
Filing 7 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Lorie Davis. (Hanna, Cara) |
Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Fee Paid Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 500046067. (mgr) |
![]() |
![]() |
Regenerated docs #1 & #2 to Respondent (mgr) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ashley Byron Burleson by on behalf of Terry Trentcosta. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (fs) |
Filing 2 Memorandum in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Terry Trentcosta. (fs) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5; receipt number 500045865), filed by Terry Trentcosta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt Copy, #3 Copy of Envelope)(fs) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (fs) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (fs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.