Gonzales Hotels v. AmGUARD Insurance Company et al
Gonzales Hotels, LLC |
Nona Loftus and AmGUARD Insurance Company |
5:2018cv00980 |
September 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Richard B Farrer |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 DEFICIENCY NOTICE:***NOTIFIED COUNSEL THAT DOCUMENT IS DEFICIENT - The notice requests affirmative relief so a motion with a certificate of conference is required*** re #14 Notice (Other) (aej) |
Filing 15 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order by AmGUARD Insurance Company, Nona Loftus. (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT - The notice requests affirmative relief so a motion with a certificate of conference is required***NOTICE of Defendant AmGUARD Insurance Company's Election of Legal Responsibility by AmGUARD Insurance Company, Nona Loftus (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kressenberg, John) Modified on 11/15/2018 (aej). |
Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Parties by Gonzales Hotels, LLC. (Grisham, Robert) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Removal - Second Amended by AmGUARD Insurance Company, Nona Loftus re #1 Notice of Removal, #11 Order to Show Cause (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A2, #3 Exhibit A3)(Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 11 SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to AmGUARD Insurance Company, Nona Loftus.. Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (aej) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Removal - AMENDED by AmGUARD Insurance Company, Nona Loftus re #9 Order, #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 9 ORDER, Defendantsare therefore ordered to file an amended notice of removal, within fourteen (14) days after thedate of this Order, that adequately alleges the citizenship of all the parties so that the Court maydetermine whether there is complete diversity. Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (aej) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (aej) |
Filing 7 Order for Scheduling Recommendations and Advisory Concerning Assignment of Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (aej) |
Filing 6 Court Advisory Concerning Discovery. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (aej) |
Filing 5 Admittance Letter to attorneys, Robert Grisham and William Kendall. (aej) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to State Court and All Other Parties of Filing of Notice of Removal by Defendants by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, NONA LOFTUS (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, NONA LOFTUS. (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, NONA LOFTUS. (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NONA LOFTUS, AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11249743), filed by NONA LOFTUS, AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement to JS44 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kressenberg, John) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (aej) |
Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (aej) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.