Angel Huerta v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's, et.al.
Angel Huerta |
Keeba Latracia Roach and Allstate Texas Lloyd's |
5:2018cv00996 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David A Ezra |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal by Keeba Latracia Roach. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Notice of Removal)(Valdez, Robert) |
Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF regarding #9 Order,, by Allstate Texas Lloyd's, Keeba Latracia Roach. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Valdez, Robert) |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF regarding #9 Order,, by Angel Huerta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Zarghouni, Matthew) |
Filing 9 ORDER NOTIFYING THE PARTIES OF THIS COURTS INTENTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF CERTAIN PUBLIC RECORDS AND REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to submit supplemental briefing on the propriety of taking judicial notice of the various state business and corporations records previously described, and on the issue of Defendant AllstateTexas Lloyds citizenship for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Suchsupplemental briefing is not to exceed seven pages, and is to be submitted on or before November 16, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. CST. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (wg) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Report Deadline due by 12/3/2018, Amended Pleadings due by 2/15/2019, Discovery due by 4/26/2019, Joinder of Parties due by 2/15/2019, Dispositive Motions due by 5/17/2019, The Court will set the case for trial by separate order. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (wg) |
Filing 7 Proposed Scheduling Order (Joint) by Allstate Texas Lloyd's, Keeba Latracia Roach. (Valdez, Robert) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Keeba Latracia Roach, re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Angel Huerta (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Valdez, Robert) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Angel Huerta. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Zarghouni, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Parties shall submit a scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order., Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (wg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Consent to Removal by Allstate Texas Lloyd's re #1 Notice of Removal, (Valdez, Robert) |
Filing 2 Remark: Letter of Non-Admission to the Western District of Texas, forwarded to Atty: Adan A. Gonzalez. (wg) |
Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (wg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Keeba Latracia Roach (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11264907), filed by Keeba Latracia Roach. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Supplemental, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J)(Valdez, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.