Brooks v. Macy's Department Store et al
| Bradd Ho Brooks |
| Joseph Genero Mendez and Macy's Department Store |
| 5:2018cv01008 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Elizabeth S Chestney |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) |
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING CASE AS FRIVOLOUS, Accordingly, Plaintiff Brooks IFP Application is GRANTED, and his 1983 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 191 5(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii) and 191 5A(b)( 1) for failureto state a non-frivolous civil rights claim. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the TDCJ Office of General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas, 78711, and TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund, P.O. Box 629, Huntsville,Texas 77342. The Clerk of Court shall also send a copy of this Dismissal Order and the Judgment in this case to: Keeper of the "Three Strikes List," Operations Division, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
|
| Filing 2 PRO-SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bradd Ho Brooks.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (wg) |
| Filing 1 PRO-SE COMPLAINT, filed by Bradd Ho Brooks.(wg) |
| Remark: Case Randomly Assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
