Santa Clara Land Company, Ltd v. Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.
| Santa Clara Land Company, Ltd |
| Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv00567 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Contract: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Santa Clara Land Company, Ltd. (Snell, David) |
Filing 7
ORDER, ( Status Conference & Hearing on all Pending Motions set for 8/29/2019 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez,). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER, ( ADR Report Deadline due by 8/22/2019,, Amended Pleadings due by 9/9/2019,, Discovery due by 2/17/2020,, Joinder of Parties due by 9/9/2019,, Dispositive Motions due by 3/23/2020,, Bench Trial set for 8/3/2020 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez,,Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/23/2020 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez,). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
|
| Filing 5 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Ponig, Christina) |
| Filing 4 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.. (Ponig, Christina) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND ADVISORY for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Plantiff shall submit agreed scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order to the Court.(Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Schedule Order due July 8, 2019); Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez.(jhw)
|
| Filing 2 Original ANSWER to Complaint by Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc..(Ponig, Christina) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (wg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12156811), filed by Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ponig, Christina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Santa Clara Land Company, Ltd v. Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christina E. Ponig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Santa Clara Land Company, Ltd | |
| Represented By: | David Clay Snell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
