Lytle v. The Hertz Corporation
| Lanita Lytle |
| The Hertz Corporation |
| 5:2019cv00636 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2020 9:30 AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia, Jury Selection and Trial set for 4/13/2020 9:30AM before Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia, ADR Report Deadline due by 9/13/2019, ADR Mediation Completed by 1/31/2020, Amended Pleadings due by 9/30/2019, Discovery due by 12/13/2019, Motions due by 12/30/2019,. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr)
|
| Filing 7 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Lanita Lytle. (Blanchard, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Scheduling Order (Joint) by Lanita Lytle. (Blanchard, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
Order for Scheduling Recommendations. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) confer with the Defendant(s) as required by Fed.R.Civ.P 26(f) andLocal Court Rule CV-16(c) to submit a proposed scheduling order for the Court's consideration within forty-five(45) days of the filing of this Order. Failure to do so may result in the Court's entering its own scheduling order. Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr)
|
| Filing 4 Letter sent to attorney Louis Durbin regarding admission into the Western District of Texas. (bc) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet by The Hertz Corporation. (Parker, George) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (bc) |
| Filing 2 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Hertz Corporation.(Parker, George) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Hertz Corporation (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12206477), filed by The Hertz Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Hertz Texas Business Filing, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's State Court Petition, #3 Exhibit Bexar Dist. Court Docket, #4 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parker, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lytle v. The Hertz Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lanita Lytle | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Blanchard |
| Represented By: | Gavin H. McInnis |
| Represented By: | Paula A. Wyatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Hertz Corporation | |
| Represented By: | George Harold Parker, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
