Donnelly et al v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
| Daniel Donnelly and Mary Fox |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Jorge Rodriguez, Thomas LaFleur and Bryan Marquez |
| 5:2019cv00882 |
| July 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Sur-reply to Motion, filed by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Mary Fox, Plaintiff Daniel Donnelly (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Cardenas-Colenso, Yesenia) |
| Filing 10 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Cardenas-Colenso, Yesenia) |
Filing 9
Order for Scheduling Recommendations. It is hereby Further Ordered that, on or before September 25, 2019, that the parties first confer as required by FED R. CIV. P. 26(f), and then submit Joint Proposed Scheduling Recommendations to the Court. Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge., ( Scheduling and Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/26/2019 10:30 AM before Judge Henry J. Bemporad). Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling Recommendations, #2 Consent)(mgr)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER this instant action is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Henry Bemporad for initial pretrial conference and entry of a scheduling order. Signed by Jason K. Pulliam. (rf)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Daniel Donnelly, Mary Fox, re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Mary Fox, Plaintiff Daniel Donnelly Plaintiffs' Reply in support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Tracy, Eric) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Jason K. Pulliam for all proceedings. Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (jkda)
|
| Filing 5 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Mary Fox, Plaintiff Daniel Donnelly (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Cardenas-Colenso, Yesenia) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand by Daniel Donnelly, Mary Fox. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX A TxDOT Crash Report, #2 Exhibit EX B TxDOT Crash Report Codes, #3 Exhibit EX C TxDOT Report)(Tracy, Eric) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.. (Cardenas-Colenso, Yesenia) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Yesenia E. Cardenas-Colenso on behalf of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Cardenas-Colenso, Yesenia) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (bc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12389334), filed by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental)(Viehman, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
