Walker v. U.S. Marshall/BOP/FEDS et al
| Darren Lynn Walker |
| Lorie Davis and U.S. Marshall/BOP/FEDS |
| 5:2019cv01233 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #1 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Darren Lynn Walker is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to allow Petitioner a chance to litigate his motion for a bench warrant in the appropriate court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the motion in Petitioner's criminal case in cause number 4:90-cr-0022-DC (W.D. Tex.). This Court DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg) (copy of the petition and this order were sent to the Pecos Division, via email transmission, Attention Yvette Lujan)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Darren Lynn Walker. (fs) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number 500051422), filed by Darren Lynn Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt, #3 Copy of Cover Letter, #4 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
