Smith v. Farrer et al
| Charmane Smith |
| Thomas L. Parker, Tu M. Pham, Henry J. Bemporad and Richard B. Farrer |
| 5:2019cv01345 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Elizabeth S Chestney |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (bc) |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bc)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bc)
|
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (bc) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charmane Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(bc) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia no longer assigned to the case. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Referral Judge: Elizabeth S. Chestney. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
