Holmes v. Joseph et al
Travis Holmes |
Matthew R Joseph and Werner Enterprises, Inc. |
5:2019cv01366 |
November 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Elizabeth S Chestney |
Jason K Pulliam |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ( Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/25/2020,, Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2020 10:45 AM before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney,). Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr) |
Filing 14 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Robbins on behalf of Travis Holmes. Attorney Melissa Robbins added to party Travis Holmes(pty:pla) (Robbins, Melissa) |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Matthew Joseph Redwood, incorrectly named Matthew R. Joseph. (mgr) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Reply to Plaintiff's Original Petition. On November 21, 2019, Defendants jointly filed their #6 Original Reply, which is properly referred to as their Answer in federal court. Defendants now seek to file an amended reply. The Court grants the motion and directs the Clerk of Court to file the reply that is attached as Exhibit A to the motion. The Clerk should docket it as a First Amended Answer filed by Defendant Matthew Joseph Redwood, incorrectly named Matthew R. Joseph. Because this amended answer relates only to one of the two defendants, the #6 Original Reply remains effective as to Werner Enterprises, Inc. Entered by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(rw) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Defendants' First Amended Reply by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Warren, Larry) |
Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Attorneys Alexander Begum & Bryan Schoeppey. (mgr) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (mgr) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COURT ALL REMOVAL DOCS SERVED ON ALL PARTIES-COUNSEL by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 6 DEFENDANTS ORIGINAL REPLY ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 4 APPENDIX by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 3 BRIEF by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 2 APPENDIX by Matthew R Joseph, Werner Enterprises, Inc.. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Werner Enterprises, Inc., Matthew R Joseph (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12877481), filed by Werner Enterprises, Inc., Matthew R Joseph. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Warren, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.