Fred Norris v. City of San Antonio, et al
| Fred Norris |
| City of San Antonio, SAPD #1504 Aguero, SAPD #0154 Flores, San Antonio Police Department, Bexar County, SAPD #1330 Lesperance, Bexar County Coroner's Office, Bexar County Coroner, SAPD #0625 Frazier, SAPD #2007 Terrazas, Unknown Employee of Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office and SAPD #3060 Perez |
| 5:2020cv00423 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Defendant's Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED and this case is closed. (rg) |
Filing 8
DISMISSAL ORDER - ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; GRANTING #5 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Motions to Dismiss (docket no. 2, docket no. 4 & docket no. 5)are hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED. This case is closed. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)
|
| Filing 7 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Fred Norris. (Notzon, Marcel) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Fred Norris. ORDERED thatwithin seven (7) days of the date of this OrderPlaintiff must SHOW CAUSE as to why Defendants motions should not be granted as unopposed and/or on the merits. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by SAPD #0154 Flores, SAPD #0625 Frazier, SAPD #1330 Lesperance, SAPD #1504 Aguero, SAPD #2007 Terrazas, SAPD #3060 Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Insufficient Process, #2 Exhibit 2 -- Declarations of Movants Regarding Insufficient Service)(Fitzpatrick, Shawn) |
| Filing 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of San Antonio. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Urbis, Michael) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #3 Motion to Substitute Attorney. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Kristin K. Bloodworth is substituted as counsel for Defendants Bexar County Medical Examiners Office and Bexar County Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Randall Frost entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Bexar County, Bexar County Coroner, Bexar County Coroner's Office, Unknown Employee of Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bloodworth, Kristin) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief can be Granted by Bexar County, Bexar County Coroner, Bexar County Coroner's Office. (Green, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bexar County (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-13411583), filed by Bexar County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #2 Exhibit Citation to Bexar County, #3 Exhibit State Court Case Events Page, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplement, #6 Supplement JS-44 supplement additional page)(Green, Robert) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (rg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
