Cantu v. United States Department of Justice et al
| Mark A. Cantu |
| Christopher Combs, William P. Barr, Carmen Portillo, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Christopher A. Wray and United States Department of Justice |
| 5:2020cv00632 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United States Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mgr) |
| Filing 4 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Mark A. Cantu. (mgr) |
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Mark A. Cantu. (nm) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to William P. Barr, U.S Department of Justice, Special Federal Agent Christopher Combs, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Special Federal Agent Carmen Portillo, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Christopher A. Wray, Federal Bureau of Investigations. (nm) Modified on 5/27/2020 (nm). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 400; receipt number 500054325), filed by Mark A. Cantu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt, #3 Copy of Envelope)(nm) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (nm) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (nm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
