Sims v. Mc Dilda et al
Plaintiff: Frances Marie Sims
Defendant: CHERYL BELLESEN and EILEEN MCDILDA
Case Number: 5:2020cv00722
Filed: June 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lel)
July 20, 2020 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to EILEEN MCDILDA. (mgr)
July 17, 2020 Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Frances Marie Sims. For Eileen McDilda (Jones, Brian)
July 17, 2020 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against CHERYL BELLESEN, EILEEN MCDILDA amending, filed by Frances Marie Sims. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Amended Complaint)(Jones, Brian)
July 15, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Adam Richard Abrams by on behalf of CHERYL BELLESEN. (Abrams, Adam)
July 15, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by CHERYL BELLESEN. (Abrams, Adam)
July 15, 2020 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint . Attorney Adam Richard Abrams added to party CHERYL BELLESEN(pty:dft) by CHERYL BELLESEN. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Dismiss, #2 Motion for Admission)(Abrams, Adam)
June 30, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Frances Marie Sims. CHERYL BELLESEN served on 6/24/2020, answer due 7/15/2020. (Jones, Brian)
June 22, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CHERYL BELLESEN and EILEEN MCDILDA. (bc)
June 19, 2020 Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc)
June 19, 2020 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (bc)
June 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT 5:20-cv-00722 (Filing fee Paid $ 400. Receipt #0542-13680751), filed by Frances Marie Sims. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Cheryl Bellsen, #4 Summons Eileen McDilda)(Jones, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sims v. Mc Dilda et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHERYL BELLESEN
Represented By: Adam Richard Abrams
Represented By: Kevin R. Sauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EILEEN MCDILDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frances Marie Sims
Represented By: Brian Arthur Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?