Rios v. Wal-Mart
| Henry Rios |
| Wal-Mart |
| 5:2020cv00910 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Henry J Bemporad |
| Fred Biery |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Regular and Certified Mailing of #7 Order sent to Henry Rios. (bc) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney--Steven A. Nunez. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file an advisory with the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order informing the Court whether he intends to proceed pro se or obtain new counsel. Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (bc)
|
| Mailed copies of #8 Motion to Withdraw and #9 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw to plaintiff at the last known address (bc) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Henry Rios. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (bc) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, ( Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 11/3/2020 02:30 PM before Judge Henry J. Bemporad,). Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (Attachments: #1 Consent Advisory to the Clerk of Court)(cd)
|
| Filing 6 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Wal-Mart. (Floyd, James) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
|
| Filing 4 COURT ADVISORY CONCERNING DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc) |
|
Filing 3
Order for Scheduling Recommendations. The parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within sixty days of the date of this Order. Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
|
| Filing 2 Letter sent to attorney: Steven A. Nunez regarding admission into the Western District of Texas(cd) |
| Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cd) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (cd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-13834120), filed by Wal-Mart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F)(Daw, Willie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rios v. Wal-Mart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart | |
| Represented By: | Willie Ben Daw, III |
| Represented By: | James K. Floyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Henry Rios | |
| Represented By: | Steven A. Nunez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
