Boucard v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al
| Natalie Boucard |
| Academic Healthplans, Inc. and UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company |
| 5:2020cv01015 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David A Ezra |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Defendant UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company (Clack, Lance) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Report Deadline due by 12/3/2020, Amended Pleadings due by 1/11/2021, Discovery due by 6/30/2021, Motions due by 7/15/2021,. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (mgr)
|
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Natalie Boucard, re #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support filed by Defendant UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Calhoun, Michelle) |
| Filing 7 Scheduling Recommendations by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, Natalie Boucard, and Academic Healthplans, Inc. (Clack, Lance) Modified on 10/1/2020 To edit text (bc). |
|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Response deadline to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss is enlarged from September 18, 2020 to October 2, 2020. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ed)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by Natalie Boucard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Calhoun, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Academic Healthplans, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sewell, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company. (Clack, Lance) |
|
Filing 3
Order for Scheduling Recommendations. The parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (bc)
|
| Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (bc) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company. (Clack, Lance) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-13911151), filed by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 1 of 7, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 2 of 7, #4 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 3 of 7, #5 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 4 of 7, #6 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 5 of 7, #7 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 6 of 7, #8 Exhibit B - Certificate Part 7 of 7, #9 Exhibit C - State Court Documents, #10 Exhibit D - List of Parties and Counsel, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Supplement)(Clack, Lance) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
