DOE v. U.T.S.A, Et Al
| JON UTSA DOE |
| University of Texas at San Antonio(UTSA), ERIC BREY and University of Texas at San Antonio |
| 5:2020cv01039 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David A Ezra |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by JON UTSA DOE, re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint filed by Defendant ERIC BREY, Defendant University of Texas at San Antonio (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gorman, Terry) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Deadline for Plaintiff to file a Response by October29, 2020. No further extensions. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lc)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by JON UTSA DOE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gorman, Terry) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Response due on or before Oct. 26, 2020. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lc)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by JON UTSA DOE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gorman, Terry) |
|
Filing 8
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order., Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (wg)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by ERIC BREY, University of Texas at San Antonio. (Molina, Ralph) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Ralph Michael Molina by on behalf of ERIC BREY, University of Texas at San Antonio. (Molina, Ralph) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ERIC BREY. (cd) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to University of Texas at San Antonio. (cd) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by JON UTSA DOE. UTSA (Gorman, Terry) |
| Case assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cd) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (cd) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by JON UTSA DOE. (Gorman, Terry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ORIGINAL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13927111), filed by JON UTSA DOE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gorman, Terry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
