Mlodzianowski v. Markus
| Joseph Mlodzianowski |
| Brian Markus |
| 5:2020cv01142 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Brian Markus, re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer filed by Defendant Brian Markus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Chiarello, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Joseph Mlodzianowski, re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer filed by Defendant Brian Markus (mgr) |
Text Order GRANTING #3 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File to File Response. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Rule CV-7 of the Local Court Rules of the Western District of Texas, the clerk promptly file Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant Brian Markuss Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer, which was attached to the Motion for Leave as Appendix A entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer by Joseph Mlodzianowski. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Proposed Order)(Cook, Brendan) |
| Filing 2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer by Brian Markus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Chiarello, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Brian Markus (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-14007488), filed by Brian Markus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement)(Chiarello, Katherine) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (mgr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mlodzianowski v. Markus | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brian Markus | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Patrice Chiarello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Mlodzianowski | |
| Represented By: | Courtney E. Giles |
| Represented By: | Brendan D. Cook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
