Roberts v. IRS Commissioner et al
| Rodney Lyle Roberts |
| Pamela Cardwell and IRS Commissioner |
| 5:2020cv01150 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Henry J Bemporad |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7429 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #5 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically. Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (bc)
|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Copy of USM-285, Summons Issued for #4 Complaint, and #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (bc) |
| Filing 5 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Rodney Lyle Roberts.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (bc) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT, filed by Rodney Lyle Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mgr) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Rodney Lyle Roberts. (nm) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rodney Lyle Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (nm) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (nm) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K PULLIAM. (nm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
