Nguyen v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Hoang Bao Nguyen
Respondent: Debra Achim, William Barr, Reynaldo Castro, Chris Wolf and Deborah Achim
Case Number: 5:2020cv01159
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Fred Biery
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Mailed out Order #13 along with a 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition form to the Plaintiff at the Bexar County Jail address. (bc)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER-- Petitioner originally complained he was being unlawfully detained by Respondents; however, the Respondents no longer have Petitioner in their custody. To the extent Petitioner seeks to challenge his current detention in Bexar County, he must submit a new 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to send Petitioner a 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition form. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
November 16, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Hoang Bao Nguyen. Address updated to the Bexar County Jail address (bc)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT-- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition filed by Petitioner Hoang Bao Nguyen (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Motions pending, if any, are also DISMISSED, and this case is now CLOSED. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE--Accordingly, Petitioners 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
October 20, 2020 Filing 8 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Deborah Achim, William Barr, Reynaldo Castro, Chris Wolf. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lowry, Faith)
October 6, 2020 Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt-Green Card Return for Ray Castro; Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 and Service Order #3 (bc)
October 6, 2020 Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt-Green Card Return for U.S. Attorney's Office; Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 and Service Order #3 (bc)
October 5, 2020 Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt-Green Card Return for Deborah Achim Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 and Service Order #3 (bc)
October 1, 2020 Filing 4 Certified Mailing Receipts of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #3 Order Directing Service to: Deborah Achim, U.S Attorney's Office, and Ray Castro. (bc)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE--IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the U.S. District Clerk: (1) furnish the Office of the U.S. Attorney in San Antonio, Texas, with copies of the Petition (ECF No. 1) and this Order, and that such delivery by certified mail return receipt requested will constitute sufficient service of process on Respondents Chad Wolf and William Barr; and (2) serve Respondents Ray Castro and Deborah Achim by certified mail return receipt requested. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (bc)
September 30, 2020 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Hoang Bao Nguyen. (nm)
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 500055657), filed by Hoang Bao Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt, #3 Copy of Envelope)(nm)
September 28, 2020 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (nm)
September 28, 2020 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (nm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nguyen v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Debra Achim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Barr
Represented By: Mary F. Kruger
Represented By: Faith Johnson Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Reynaldo Castro
Represented By: Faith Johnson Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chris Wolf
Represented By: Faith Johnson Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Deborah Achim
Represented By: Faith Johnson Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Hoang Bao Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?