Gyanu Kushawah v. Wipro Ltd.
| GYANU KUSHAWAH |
| WIPRO LTD |
| 5:2020cv01184 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Contract: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-14038193). No Summons requested at this time, filed by GYANU KUSHAWAH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Poncio, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gyanu Kushawah v. Wipro Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WIPRO LTD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GYANU KUSHAWAH | |
| Represented By: | Adam Poncio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
