Ray v. Feifer et al
Plaintiff: Naujee Laurent Ray
Defendant: Officer FNU Feifer and W. R. Rusty Hierholzer
Case Number: 5:2020cv01224
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Orlando L Garcia
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT - ORDERED that Plaintiff Naujee Laurent Rays section 1983 Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim based on the failure to exhaust available administrative remedies, subject to refiling upon exhaustion of his administrative remedies. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL re #1 1983 Complaint filed by Naujee Laurent Ray isDISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim based on the failure to exhaust available administrative remedies, subject to refiling upon exhaustion of his administrative remedies. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of NAUJEE LAURENT RAY. the Court has determined his request to proceed IFP should be GRANTED. (ECF No. 4). Rays Complaint is accepted by the Court withoutprepayment of fees, costs, or security. (ECF No. 1). The Clerk of the Court (the Clerk) is directed to mail a copy of this Order to: Kerr County Sheriffs Office Attn: Inmate Fiscal/Finance 400 Clearwater Paseo Kerrville, TX 78028. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)(copy of this order mailed to the Kerr County Sheriff's Office)
October 28, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Naujee Laurent Ray. (rg)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Ray shall either pay the filing fee or submit a signed Application to Proceed IFP, along with a current six (6) month history of his inmate trust fund account. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg)
October 15, 2020 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Naujee Laurent Ray. (dtg)
October 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Naujee Laurent Ray. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(dtg)
October 13, 2020 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (dtg)
October 13, 2020 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (dtg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ray v. Feifer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer FNU Feifer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W. R. Rusty Hierholzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Naujee Laurent Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?