Royall v. Asset Acceptance LLC
| Sharon Royall |
| Asset Acceptance LLC |
| 5:2020cv01240 |
| October 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement Tentative by Asset Acceptance LLC (Eichhorn, Cory) |
Text Order GRANTING as unopposed #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. Defendant Asset Acceptance, LLC shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before November 23, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (RBF)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Asset Acceptance LLC answer due 11/23/2020. (bc) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Asset Acceptance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Eichhorn, Cory) |
| Set Deadlines: Asset Acceptance LLC answer due 11/9/2020. (cd) |
|
Text Order GRANTING as UNOPPOSED #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. Answer or other response to the Complaint is due on or before November 9, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (RBF)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. Referral Magistrate Judge: Richard B. Farrer. (bc)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Asset Acceptance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Midland Credit Management, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(Eichhorn, Cory) |
| Filing 2 Letter sent to attorney: Kevin A. Teters regarding admission into the Western District of Texas. (bc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (bc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Asset Acceptance LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-14086538), filed by Asset Acceptance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Composite Exhibit A)(Eichhorn, Cory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Royall v. Asset Acceptance LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sharon Royall | |
| Represented By: | William Maurice Clanton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Asset Acceptance LLC | |
| Represented By: | Cory W. Eichhorn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
