Davila Sanchez v. Huron et al
Leinier Davila Sanchez |
Jose M. Correa, Chad Wolf, Thomas S. Wimkowski, Andrew Huron, Timothy S. Robbins and Matthew T. Albence |
5:2020cv01378 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JUDGMENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Petitioners 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. Motionspending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, The Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). On January 7, 2021, Respondents advised the Court that on December 29, 2020, Petitioner was removed from the United States pursuant to a final order of removal, thereby mooting Petitioners complaint. It is ORDERED that Petitioners 28 U.S.C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. Motions pending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 10 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Matthew T. Albence, Jose M. Correa, Andrew Huron, Timothy S. Robbins, Thomas S. Wimkowski, Chad Wolf . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bloodworth, Kristin) |
Filing 9 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt of Petitioner's Section 2241 complaint as to Leinier Davila Sanchez. (wg) |
Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt of #7 Order, Terminate Motions, #5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (wg) |
Filing 7 ORDER MOOTING REQUEST FOR IFP AND DIRECTING SERVICE re #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Leinier Davila Sanchez,IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. District Clerk: (1) furnish the Office of the U.S. Attorney in San Antonio, Texas, with copies of the Amended Petition (ECF No. 5) and thisOrder, and that such delivery by certified mail return receipt requested will constitute sufficient service of process on Respondent's by certified mail return receipt requested. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents file a response to the Petition within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 6 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 500056381 (wg) |
Filing 5 Amended (Signed) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Leinier Davila Sanchez.(wg) |
Filing 4 ORDER that Petitioner must submit within (30) Days from the date of this Order an IFP Application with Inmate Institutional Finance Statement, and a Signed 2241. re #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Leinier Davila Sanchez, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Leinier Davila Sanchez. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward toPetitioner a 2241 Petition along with this Court's standard IFP application.Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Remark: Copy of Order, Blank IFP Appl. & Petitioner's 2241 to be signed and returned was sent to the petitioner at listed address, Via Regular Mail. (wg) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Leinier Davila Sanchez. (dtg) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leinier Davila Sanchez. (dtg) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Leinier Davila Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.