Debra Aldaco v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
| Debra Aldaco |
| Wal-Mart, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv01383 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Elizabeth S Chestney |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hm)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jenna R. Cornejo (Filing fee $ 100.00 receipt number 500056435) by on behalf of Debra Aldaco. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 copy of receipt) Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (rg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, (Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/22/2021, Initial Pretrial Conference set for 2/24/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney). Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (rg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney for disposition of all non-dispositive pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (rg)
|
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart, Inc.. (Saenz, Jaime) |
| Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter to attorney Jenna R. Cornejo for Debra Aldaco. (rg) |
| Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (rg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14245612), filed by Wal-Mart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Citation, #4 Exhibit Defendant's Answer and Jury Demand, #5 Exhibit Notice of Filing Removal (Motion to District Court), #6 Exhibit Index of Attorneys, #7 Exhibit Index of Documents, #8 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit Supplement to JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet)(Saenz, Jaime) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Debra Aldaco v. Wal-Mart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jaime Arturo Saenz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra Aldaco | |
| Represented By: | Jenna R. Cornejo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
