Windmill Wellness Ranch, LLC v. AGC Backoffice Support Services, LLC
| Windmill Wellness Ranch, LLC |
| AGC Backoffice Support Services, LLC and Meritain Health, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv01388 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule filed by Meritain Health, Inc.,Meritain shall file its Motion to Dismiss on or before February 12, 2021; Plaintiff shall Respond to both Defendants Motions to Dismiss on or before March 15, 2021; Both Defendants shall file a reply on or before March 29, 2021. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) Modified text on 1/12/2021 (wg). (Main Document 9 replaced on 1/12/2021) (wg).
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule by Meritain Health, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order - Consent Motion for Extension and Briefing Schedule)(Dougherty, Colin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Colin D. Dougherty on behalf of Meritain Health, Inc.. Attorney Colin D. Dougherty added to party Meritain Health, Inc.(pty:dft) (Dougherty, Colin) |
| Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: to attorney Paul O'Neil Incorrect case number or case style listed on document filed. The heading on this document needs to be corrected. This is not Comal County. re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (rg) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Plaintiff's deadline to file its response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is January 18, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dc3)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Windmill Wellness Ranch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(O'Neil, Paul) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Windmill Wellness Ranch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(O'Neil, Paul) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by AGC Backoffice Support Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Appendix 2, #3 Proposed Order)(Laremont, Erika) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The deadline to file any required pleading under Rule 81(c)(2) is moved to Friday, December 18, 2020.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dc3)
|
| Filing 2 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by AGC Backoffice Support Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Laremont, Erika) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (wg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AGC Backoffice Support Services, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14251850), filed by AGC Backoffice Support Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Index, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Supp to JS 44)(Rojo, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
