Kirk v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union
John F. Kirk |
Pentagon Federal Credit Union |
5:2020cv01444 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Orlando L Garcia |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order (Joint) by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Dodge, Stephanie) |
Filing 7 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Dodge, Stephanie) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey W. Larroca. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Stephanie L. Dodge for Jeffrey W. Larroca ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14411266) by on behalf of Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dodge, Stephanie) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND ADVISORY - ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) confer with the Defendant(s) to submit a proposed scheduling order for the Court's consideration within forty-five (45) days of the filing of this Order. The parties are hereby ORDERED to notify the Court whether or not they consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rg) |
Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Dodge, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Pentagon Federal Credit Union.(Dodge, Stephanie) |
Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter sent to atty: Jeffrey W. Larroca. (wg) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pentagon Federal Credit Union (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14308194), filed by Pentagon Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet)(Dodge, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kirk v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pentagon Federal Credit Union | |
Represented By: | Stephanie L. Dodge |
Represented By: | Jeffrey W. Larroca |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John F. Kirk | |
Represented By: | Dennis L. Richard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.